Preliminary Deference? The impact of judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU in cases X.Y.Z., A.B.C. and Cimade and Gisti on national law and the use of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

A newly released ECRE study shows significant impact of three asylum-related cases from the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and of the EU Charter on the national asylum policies of eight Member States. The study included seven Member States (Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK and Italy) and showed how judgments on the determination of LGBTI asylum applications: X.Y.Z and A.B.C, and reception conditions for persons subject to Dublin transfers: Cimade and Gisti, affected overall national legislation – often leading to a shift in national practices and internal guidance, and sometimes even to formal legislative changes.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/ecre/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/14102648/CJEU-study-Feb-2017-NEW.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s